edublogs

For Christmas I received a fascinating gift from a buddy - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a couple of basic triggers about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, however it's also a bit repetitive, asteroidsathome.net and really verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, considering that rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can buy any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in anybody's name, trademarketclassifieds.com including stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, produced by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He wants to widen his variety, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about information here, we in fact mean human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for imaginative functions must be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without authorization ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful but let's develop it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use developers' material on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, pipewiki.org is likewise strongly copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of delight," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its best carrying out industries on the vague pledge of growth."

A government representative stated: "No move will be made till we are definitely positive we have a useful strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them certify their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a national information library containing public information from a large range of sources will likewise be made readily available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the security of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to want the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a number of suits against AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became the a lot of downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a fraction of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But offered how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.